Be sure to share your comments in the Class Participation section below -- that's the best part!
You can use the arrows on your keyboard ← → to navigate pages.

Buy the books on Amazon
Join the conversation! There are now 6 comments on “Strict Liability pg 28
  1. KW says

    A friend of mine used to say “What part of ‘no’ didn’t you understand, the ‘n’ or the ‘o’?” :-)

  2. WJS says

    I don’t see why the Norman Conquest would be expected to change the laws significantly; England and Normandy both had common sense laws at the time, right? It was merely a change of government.

    • The Norman conquest introduced one huge change into the English legal system. Before the conquest, when a father died his land was divided up evenly between his sons and when a mother died her land was divided up evenly between her daughters. The Normans introduced primogeniture, the practice of giving all of the land to the eldest son regardless of the presence of any other children in the family. This change upended the entire English law of real property. Thus starting a chain reaction of changes as the courts and Parliament struggled to adjust to this change over several centuries. Back then the law of real property was what lawyer and judges spent most of their time and effort on because land is the principle form of wealth in an agrarian society. For an in depth study of these issues read A Concise History of The Common Law by Theodore Pluncket.

      http://www.amazon.com/Concise-History-Common-Law-NONE-ebook/dp/B00CE5KK4U/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1409262313&sr=1-1&keywords=a+concise+history+of+the+common+law

        • It’s unexpected because, aside from the laws themselves, the Normans changed almost the entire legal -system-. That’s why so many of our legal terms are of French origin. Surprising that the laws remained intact when we got all this other stuff.

Class Participation

___