Be sure to share your comments in the Class Participation section below -- that's often the best part! The comments are never closed; you're always welcome to add to the discussion. Also, if you get tired of clicking on the buttons, you can always use the arrows on your keyboard ← → to move around.

Buy the books on Amazon ___ ___
Join the conversation! There are now 5 comments on “Strict Liability pg 31
  1. WJS says

    Is it wrong that what I’m taking from this is that things ran much more smoothly when leaders focused on leadership and things went to hell after they got their hands on legislature?

    • How do you define leadership without including any legislative responsibilities?

        • This is true. However, it doesn’t change that from the time the Roman Empire collapsed to the restoration of the Monarchy after the English Civil war the people of Great Britain were usually at war with either the continental Europeans or each other. So at least as far as England is concerned, things did the opposite of running smoothly before their leaders became enthusiastic legislators.

    • This depends in part on what is meant by “more smoothly” – are things running more smoothly, for example, when a system takes no notice of the question of motive, and treats one child accidentally killing another the same as deliberate murder by an adult?

      More broadly I challenge the idea that simpler law adheres more to “common sense”, to the extent that is even meaningful – judicial innovation comes about because existing law is nonsensical.

Class Participation