Be sure to share your comments in the Class Participation section below -- that's often the best part! The comments are never closed; you're always welcome to add to the discussion. Also, if you get tired of clicking on the buttons, you can always use the arrows on your keyboard ← → to move around.

Buy the books on Amazon ___ ___
Join the conversation! There are now 4 comments on “Examples pg 23
  1. WJS says

    One would think that a girl who’s literally had a gun put to her head for sex wouldn’t throw the word “rape” around so liberally. Yeah yeah, “Rape 1” and “Rape 2”, but while it’s called rape “as a matter of law”, as a matter of fact, they aren’t two levels of the same thing, they aren’t the same thing at all.

    • Can you please clarify how being forced to have sex against your will by physical force, and being forced to have sex against your will by being drugged “aren’t the same thing at all”?

      • In the same way that having your money stolen by an armed robber who threatens to end your life if you don’t hand over the cash is much worse than having that same money pickpocketed while you sleep.

        Both things suck, but it’s no stretch at all to say the former is far worse.

        (Not that I’m trying to equate being sexually violated and losing money as at all similar in kind; rather, the point is that you can make anything much worse by adding a serious death threat to it).

  2. Gregory T. Bogosian says

    If I am interpreting this sequence correctly, the Stickie doesn’t remember what happened the night that she was with Bartholomew. So even she doesn’t know if she actually wanted to do it or not. It makes sense that this case resulted in an acquittal because it all depends on a statement that Stickie cannot support even to herself.

Class Participation

___