Be sure to share your comments in the Class Participation section below -- that's often the best part! The comments are never closed; you're always welcome to add to the discussion. Also, if you get tired of clicking on the buttons, you can always use the arrows on your keyboard ← → to move around.

Buy the books on Amazon ___ ___
Join the conversation! There are now 8 comments on “Examples pg 38
  1. Jack says

    The prosecutor claims that no jury in the state is going to think a reasonable person would be equally provoked…

    Is that for the prosecutor to decide? The prosecutor doesn’t get to decide which defense the defendant should go with, does he? Of course he knows which ones might stand a better chance than others, but if he wants to roll the dice on a jury feeling that his behavior was reasonable, isn’t that something that he’s allowed to do?

    • I’d say “yes”, because a jury WILL make the decision. He’s either guilty or innocent of that particular charge.

    • The prosecutor does not get to choose which defense the defendant uses. He’s just telling the guy (and us) that this particular defense isn’t likely to work nowadays.

      If this were a real case that went to trial, nothing’s stopping the defendant from making the argument to a jury.

  2. mist42nz says

    The jury would be lying then.
    Most people would throw nearby things at their partner (and often hit them) and destroy property if they believed they had caught them cheating.

    Some would even plot or talk about murder. Although this clearly wasn’t an attempt to murder, it was just a temper tantrum.

Class Participation