Transcript

Be sure to share your comments in the Class Participation section below -- that's the best part! Also, you can use the arrows on your keyboard to flip through pages quickly.
Follow on social media Follow on Facebook Follow on Twitter Follow on Instagram




Buy the books on Amazon
Join the conversation!
There are now 3 comments... what are your thoughts?
  1. J says

    If I conspire with Jane, and Bob conspires with Susan, then both I and Bob are conspirators; but we’re not co-conspirators. However, Bob and Susan are co-conspirators; they conspired with each other.

    Thus “co-conspirators” conveys the clarity that two parties have not merely conspired, but conspired with each other.

    • I agree with you in principle, as I too enjoy the elegance of the usage, but I do not think the majority of english speakers employing the term are using in in that sense.

      • To the contrary, I checked the usage in the Corpus of Historical American English (COHA) and this usage is commonplace. People use “co-conspirator” to describe a conspirator who’s involved with either a previously mentioned conspirator or previously mentioned conspiracy. If you’re a “conspirator” you conspire in general, but if you’re a “co-conspirator” you’re part of the conspiracy in question, or more often, conspiring together with the other person or persons being discussed.

        Conspirator is a bit like “member of a class” while co-conspirator is like “classmate.” Common usage does support it.

Class Participation