Again, behind this principle we see a deeper principle of volition. If Jack was going to die anyway, then she wasn’t in control of that. She was choosing to actively save herself, rather than actively choosing to kill him. That analysis could get messy, but then again so is real life. That’s why we have juries.

 

Transcript

Be sure to share your comments in the Class Participation section below -- that's the best part! Also, you can use the arrows on your keyboard to flip through pages quickly.

Click below to buy the books, and a portion of the proceeds goes to
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital! Use this link to buy the books, and a portion of the proceeds goes to St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
Join the conversation!
There are now 5 comments... what are your thoughts?
  1. chris says

    hmm… Depends, are any of these states that employ the ” modern ” thinking have mountain climbing ranges?

    • Almost all states that have mountains have mountain climbs. I’ve done it up and down the East Coast

  2. Jeremy P. Harford says

    Obvious Question: What if Jack *asked* Jill to cut him down, seeing that his death was a forgone conclusion? That would be the right thing for Jack to do in any state.

    • It would be her word against… well, basically just her word, I guess. Even so, I don’t think “he asked me to” is an acceptable justification for killing someone as a matter of law.

      • Yes, you get into assisted suicide at that point. And yes, it’d still be just her word, unless she had a recorder going.

Leave a Reply to chris Cancel reply