Be sure to share your comments in the Class Participation section below -- that's often the best part! The comments are never closed; you're always welcome to add to the discussion. Also, if you get tired of clicking on the buttons, you can always use the arrows on your keyboard ← → to move around.

Buy the books on Amazon ___ ___
Join the conversation! There are now 3 comments on “Self-Defense pg 27
  1. Robert says

    I guess this kinda goes into the territory of when people say “My hands are registered as deadly weapons.” It’s largely a myth (from what I hear, there is no real registry for it), but one’s skill might come into context in a hearing concerning the death of someone in a case of self defense. If two people get into a scrap, and the defender, let’s say, punches the aggressor in the throat, causing his trachea to collapse, killing him, largely that’d be an unfortunate accident. However if the defender is known to be a black belt in a martial art, then the court has reason to ask why they didn’t use their training for a non-lethal takedown.

    • Yup. There are black belts, and then there are black belts, of course. But it could certainly be relevant to the issue here: whether it was reasonable for him to believe that deadly force was necessary.

    • That sounds more about whether the defendant intended to use lethal force than about justification, though.
      (Incidentally, a lot of martial arts instructors teach their students to use excessive force “just in case”; would this be a potential criminal issue if a student of theirs got into trouble, or would they simply get sued for giving horrendously bad training?)

Class Participation

___