Be sure to share your comments in the Class Participation section below -- that's the best part! Also, you can use the arrows on your keyboard to flip through pages quickly.
Join the conversation!
There are now 10 comments on pg 108. Protective Sweep?.
What are your thoughts?
  1. Marc Katz says

    Just an unrelated question, can a house worker, someone employed at a house but not owning it at all, allow the police to come in and search without the owner’s permission? Likewise, can someone who’s renting a house let the police in without the owner’s permission, and vice versa? In both cases, the police do not have a warrant or any court order.

      • Curious question.
        A worker could be seen as a legal agent for the owner.
        OTOH, it’s also possible to suppress the evidence because it’s difficult to determine who owns “X”. And it can then be challenged on Standing, that there was no legal standing for the individual to grant permission for a search, countering the first one.

        Also, it would probably depend on who gave the consent. The maid? Maybe. A Chemlawn worker or gardener? Seems shaky.

    • Not a lawyer, but just have to add — as far as I’m aware, a renter can authorize a search in their rental home/apt/condo/etc without the landlord’s consent (and theirs alone — Apt #104 can’t authorize a search at Apt #105). However, a landlord cannot provide consent to search a renter’s property while it’s being rented. (I think it was Chapman v. United States, 1960)

      My father owns a few condominiums in a relatively low-income area, and this became a potential issue a few years back.

  2. shirenomad says

    The law of Nephilopolis would be quite the discussion!

    • You have initiated an unauthorized comment/chat/microblog/other social media interaction on the laws, statutes, ordinances, rules, regulations and/or practices of Nephilopolis without properly filing form FB-1337 within ten days prior to such activity, and are now in violation of UR 672(a)(3)(B). Please file form ZUT9 with the appropriate fine determined from the punishment table for Class C late filing as updated. Failure to comply within 24 hours of receiving this notice is a crime punishable as a level 3 offense and must be registered accordingly. Copies of this notification have been filed with the Department of Regulation, the Department of Inquisition, and the Department of Notifications, each of which may require subsequent actions on your part.

  3. WJS says

    Uh, wasn’t the protective sweep only if they don’t feel safe? ☆ felt threatened by an (apparently) empty house?

    • If I’m in a dark house which I think was broken into by a desperate criminal who just moments ago shot at me… I’m not feeling super safe. Even if he ditched that gun, he may have another, or grabbed a baseball bat/butcher knife, or may have the homeowner in a stranglehold keeping them from crying out, and so on.

Class Participation