Support the Guide on Patron!

Be sure to share your comments in the Class Participation section below -- that's the best part! Also, you can use the arrows on your keyboard to flip through pages quickly.

Use this link to buy the books, and a portion of the proceeds goes to St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

Join the conversation! There are now 14 comments on this chapter's page 53. Jane Respectfully Declines to Answer. What are your thoughts?
  1. Bill says

    If she had started off by saying she had done nothing wrong, would that be considered waiving her fifth amendment rights and open the door to follow-up questions? Would it change anything if she were, say, an employee of the federal government and testifying about her official duties (hypothetically speaking, of course)?

  2. Y. Exeter says

    Welp. This will end well.

  3. Being the artist for a web comic which claims, among other things, that the government is not lays right, I’m VERY curious what the best answers to these questions would be.

  4. Gregory Bogosian says

    If the fifth amendment really does guarantee the right to refuse to answer any and all questions asked in Congressional hearings, then why doesn’t it just guarantee the right to not appear for questioning in the first place? It seems like it would save a lot of time. Did the Supreme Court just bank on those who have actually done something wrong eventually breaking down and answering the questions and those who have done nothing wrong refraining from answering any questions throughout the entire hearing? Or is the fifth amendment just completely irrelevant to the validity of subpoenas, even when their only purpose is to make someone submit to questioning and thus incriminate themselves? The sole purpose of this hearing is to make Janie incriminate herself, isn’t it?

      • IIRC, it prevents you from self-incriminating. Therefore, it will put a large suspicion on you, though from what I understand, it is important to consider that self-incrimination might not be in relation to the act for which you are interrogated. You can plead the Fifth if you are interrogated in a burglary affair because at the time of the burglary, you were killing someone on the other side of the town.

        Am I right here?

        • There are also the issues of misinterpretation, taking out of context, false assumptions, hearing what you want to hear, none of your f***ing business, “that’s classified, but I can’t even tell you that”, and so forth. The 5th amendment lets you replac all of that with a “mere” suspicion.

  5. Jeff says

    Hee hee, affine planes. <3

  6. I think Mr. Rogers was the only one to actually appease these giants.

  7. WJS says

    Because she can tell which way the wind is blowing?

Class Participation

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Support the Guide on Patron!