This is a purely educational website. Nothing here is legal advice or creates or implies an attorney-client relationship. If you have a specific legal issue, PLEASE talk to a lawyer who practices where you live—laws vary from place to place, and how they're applied varies from courthouse to courthouse. Your local county bar association can probably refer someone.
By using this site, you agree that you are awesome. Use of this site also constitutes acceptance of its
Terms of Service and Privacy Policies, which are known to medical science as a cure for insomnia.
It's best to keep all discussions in the comments. But if you really need to reach Nathan privately, go ahead and email him at n.e.burney@gmail.com. He won't mind.
THE ILLUSTRATED GUIDE TO LAW and the PEEKING JUSTICE logo are pretty damn cool trademarks and should probably be registered one of these days.
© Nathaniel Burney. All rights reserved, though they really open up once you get to know them.
So the best way to do witness questioning would be to have them tell their story and have non leading questions asked at the end.
Would it also be a useful change to have this recorded and entered into evidence instead of having the witness respond to leading questions months later at trial?
“Regarding depositions to preserve testimony, the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution establishes a constitutional right of the defendant to be present during the deposition and to cross-examine the witness”
It won’t fly that way, the questions have to be asked again unless the defendant is there, which would be quite a stretch.
but i guess after having a non leading questioning, the story “stuck” in the witness’s mind will be more similar to the real one, and from what ive seen, most cross examination use facts to disprove testimony, which would work anyway.
Not true. Good cross-examination is vital, because when you bring a witness in, you need to determine the credibility of the witness. Even well-intentioned witnesses can make mistakes, omit certain facts, or miss key details that cross-examination can draw out, and a malicious witness who can spin a well-rehearsed story for the cops can have his testimony shredded by a good lawyer who can pick out inconsistencies and lies on cross. These are things you cannot do with a videotape, and even when a deposition is used for evidence in place of testimony when a witness is unavailable (because they died, for instance), there’s a cross during the deposition.
(and for what it’s worth, when you are questioning a witness, you can’t ask leading questions anyways, except during cross or under special circumstances)
i cant really see the notes on the first panel, what do they say?
It’s this page. Just jogging your memory about the page on jogging your memory.
We need to go deeper!
Remind me how we do that?