Support the Guide on Patron!

Be sure to share your comments in the Class Participation section below -- that's the best part! Also, you can use the arrows on your keyboard to flip through pages quickly.

Use this link to buy the books, and a portion of the proceeds goes to St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

Join the conversation! There are now 10 comments on this chapter's page 61. Frack’s Frustration. What are your thoughts?
  1. Jeremy says

    Frack = ‘dangerous’? though i suppose it’s in scare quotes.

  2. Why on earth are they called “scare” quotes? Writers use them to say “so-called” or “so to speak” — not to say “boo!”

  3. Zach says

    I guess this one I’m really having a problem with. Why, if buying talc-cocaine is still illegal (the mistake in fact being the cocaine being talc instead of cocaine), is the voodoo-guy not in trouble (the mistake in fact being that voodoo is bunk instead of voodoo being legitimate)?

    • The short answer is that the voodoo example wasn’t about mistake. Joe the voodoo guy couldn’t have been charged with KILLING Simon, because his act did not cause Simon’s death. His example was all about actus reus. But he did sincerely attempt to commit the crime.

      But Joe is distinguishable here, as well. Frack could have succeeded, had he not been stymied by the cops. Joe never could have succeeded. His attempt wasn’t merely impossible due to happenstance, but because the universe doesn’t work that way.

      In most jurisdictions, there’s no way he could be punished for attempt, because he never got close to succeeding. In an “any overt act” kind of jurisdiction, the prosecutor might have more discretion to charge him, though it’d probably still be laughed out of court.

Class Participation

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Support the Guide on Patron!