Be sure to share your comments in the Class Participation section below -- that's the best part! Also, you can use the arrows on your keyboard to flip through pages quickly.

Click below to buy the books, and a portion of the proceeds goes to
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital! Use this link to buy the books, and a portion of the proceeds goes to St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
Join the conversation!
There are now 3 comments... what are your thoughts?
  1. WJS says

    In reality, I would expect the sheriff to arrest both parties caught fighting, and sort out “who started it” later. I mean, both guys are going to say the other one started it, aren’t they?

    Reply ↓

    • There are two people watching this fight. So they know who started it. One could argue that they are unreliable as witnesses because they are intoxicated from drinking beer. However, they sound lucid. Also, the Sheriff is not there. Whoever started it will not be caught in the act.

      Reply ↓

      • That’s what I mean; he didn’t see who started it, and if he breaks it up and questions the witnesses without securing the fighters, the one who they finger for starting it might react poorly. He’s unlikely to get violent again with the sheriff right there, but it would seem to be an unnecessary risk.

        Reply ↓

Class Participation