This is a purely educational website. Nothing here is legal advice or creates or implies an attorney-client relationship. If you have a specific legal issue, PLEASE talk to a lawyer who practices where you live—laws vary from place to place, and how they're applied varies from courthouse to courthouse. Your local county bar association can probably refer someone.
By using this site, you agree that you are awesome. Use of this site also constitutes acceptance of its
Terms of Service and Privacy Policies, which are known to medical science as a cure for insomnia.
It's best to keep all discussions in the comments. But if you really need to reach Nathan privately, go ahead and email him at n.e.burney@gmail.com. He won't mind.
THE ILLUSTRATED GUIDE TO LAW and the PEEKING JUSTICE logo are pretty damn cool trademarks and should probably be registered one of these days.
© Nathaniel Burney. All rights reserved, though they really open up once you get to know them.
…Governing by force isn’t the innovation either, is it?
Looks like bald person got outvoted by majority of both heads and arms.
Arms, yes!
I mean, what good is democracy if you can’t force the minority to comply with the majority’s vote?
[Note: That’s a call for discussion, not an assertion. Sometimes I don’t make that clear.]
To answer your question directly: It’s not democracy that needs to be able to enforce its decisions, it’s clans, tribes, and states – whether democratic or not. One difference between Athenian democracy and band democracy is that Athens was a state.
During humanity’s band phase, democracy didn’t have any coercive power, nor did it need it. If you didn’t want to go along with the band’s decision, you were free to strike out with the people you agreed with (or on your own if you thought you could go it alone). Emotional ties to the family and the practical necessity of having people to cooperate with kept the band together. So democracy was a tool for expressing the group’s decisions and building consensus.
Athens was much larger than Dunbar’s Number, and had a state. It had to have some method of resolving disputes between citizens and coercing them to contribute to Athens’ empire (primarily through military service), as well as controlling its noncitizen and slave population. So Athens’ democracy (and modern democratic republics) need some kind of fist to enforce the majority’s decision on minorities. Otherwise you get the “make me” scene from the part where clan-tribe societies were figuring out dispute resolution.
The new site navigation doesn’t have any links to the blog from the main site. It was included in the top bar before, but the new “Contents” menu doesn’t link to it, nor does any other part of the site.
Hmm, let me see if I can do something about that. Fix one thing, break another: that’s me!
Also, I see that Justice still has her sword even while the State has her hammer. I wonder in which part of history does Justice put her sword down and let the State be the only one with a weapon, and what historical event does that represent? (Justice and the State do seem more antagonistic in the future.)